Great Neil Pierce column on passenger rail
It starts off like this:
Are the stars finally coming into alignment for an American passenger-rail system that's even mildly comparable to 21st-century world standards?
America's train advocates are mildly optimistic. And for some good reasons. Amtrak is reporting impressive ridership gains. Oil is pushing $100 a barrel, throwing a long shadow over affordability of travel on already congested highways. Airport delays hit an all-time high last summer. Global climate concerns are mounting.
Rail freight demands, meanwhile, are rising fast, suggesting joint improvements with passenger rail. Worries are rising about mobility gaps hindering the ability of America's "megaregions" — the Northeast, Great Lakes, California and others — to match the performance of competitive regions worldwide.
There's also a nice quote from our Executive Director Rick Harnish:
And no one knows, notes Rick Harnish of the Midwest High Speed Rail Association, how expansive demand for Amtrak service would be if many more routes were opened, offering at least three or four trains daily for reasonable frequency. His bet is that millions of Americans would opt for the more convenient system, especially as oil soars in cost: "For 50 years we assumed we could do everything by car. It's now painfully clear that's not true."
To read the rest, including a plug for the National Corridors Institute conference in St. Louis on January 28-29, check out the Chronicle's site here.